Why should the public support Craigslist? Because of the principle that internet services companies cannot be made responsible for the speech of their users. I think that we all agree that Google, Yahoo and Microsoft should not be held accountable for criminal content sent by private users of their email services. What complicates the matter is that web services are varied. Craigslist should not, for example, be allowed to create a category that is limited to illegal services (such as murder for hire). However, most of what gets posted in adult services is legal, and illegal ads are posted in other sections. In fact, legal precedent here concerned ads for housing. In Chicago Lawyers' Committee For Civil Rights Under Law v. Craigslist the judge wrote:
Using the remarkably candid postings on Craigslist, the Lawyers' Committee can identify many targets to investigate. It can dispatch testers and collect damages from any landlord or owner who engages in discrimination. .... It can assemble a list of names to send to the Attorney General for prosecution. But ... it cannot sue the messenger just because the message reveals a third-party's plan to engage in unlawful discrimination(quoted from WebProNews, which has links to the original).
Clearly, people are using the adult services section of Craigslist to commit crimes. Those criminals should be stopped. In my opinion, the attorneys general should do their job by using the list as a tool to investigate rather than trying to force Craigslist, and, by extension, all internet service providers, into the role of censor.
No comments:
Post a Comment